prosecute this...you lying british ARSE HOLES !

knucklehead "al qaeda" shoe bomber , richard "ridiculous" reid --apprehended by passengers and stewardesses on an airliner while supposedly trying to light a fuse to detonate plastic explosives hidden in his footwear--

umm if richie bwoy , is as government insists , an "al qaeda" operative , either al qaeda must have scraped well underneath the proverbial bottom of the barrel to find him ...or some government has run a huge hoax on the gullible public concerning this so-called "war on terror" .

"*plastic explosive --A general term for any of a class of high explosives which is malleable (plastic) at room temperature. Popular because of its stability (it will not detonate when burned, dropped, or shot at), yield, and ease of use." --quoted from "everything.com"

* addendum--from further examination of articles written around the time of the shoebomber incident we find that the initial reports of plastic explosives being , pardon the pun , the "sole" ingredient in reid's shoes were revised.

the later reports claim that about 10 ounces of plastic explosives were mixed with TATP--the key ingredient described in deskRat's "did they bull-sh_ _ us again?" posting of 8-24-06 .

according to officials , the TATP was to be the detonator of the plastic explosives in reid's shoes.

a fuse containing black powder was supposed to trigger the TATP detonator , but again the official plot fails to make sense .

first of all , why use a "sore thumb" standout like reid for an operation you wanted to succeed ?

he was described by law enforcement officials as too stupid to tie his own shoelaces . they referred to him as the "kramer of al qaeda" --tall , clumsy , goofy-looking with a wild hairstyle .

one of the stewardess commented that reid repeatedly refused to eat or drink anything -- even water -- during the long 10 hour trans-atlantic flight and drew further suspicions because his physical appearance was weird like a "druggie ."

if al qaeda's plan was to blowup aircraft by smuggling bombs on board undetected in shoes , why tip their hand by sending such a conspicuous-looking imbecile ?

the question too must be raised concerning who passed reid through french , dutch and israeli security when his travel history , behavior profile , use of one way tickets paid for in cash , lack of any check-in luggage for an overseas flight and most importantly , his poorly forged passport --whose picture reid did not even match , should have immediately triggered the warning alarms as signs these nations' highly trained airport security professionals are taught to spot.

it would take a sophisticated chemist and operative to create the TATP , mix the highly unstable crystals in with plastic explosives , place it all in a shoe and NOT prematurely detonate the bomb by walking too heavily , stumbling , tripping etc --in other words , the stuff was so unstable that a simple unexpected impact could set it off .

reid's plot was discovered when passengers complained of smelling something burning as he ignited matches and held them to his sneakers .

the stewardess warned him that NO SMOKING WAS ALLOWED ON THE FLIGHT. WHEN HE CONTINUED LIGHTING MATCHES the stewardess finally saw that he was trying to light the fuse in his sneaker . she began screaming and fighting him which then triggered the confrontation , and passenger intervention that led to reid's apprehension.

but the point is , that drawing even more attention to himself by lighting matches on a plane was not best means of detonation for richard reid's shoe device ..."What Richard Reid didn’t know, as he tried to strike a match to ignite his TATP-lined shoes, was that it’s very shock-sensitive. If he had simply stamped his foot, he and the plane might have been history."




also on related theme , there was a story at alex jones' site infowars.com that said british authorities were threatening to prosecute certain individuals , including bloggers , because the brits were incensed at a report carried by the new york times that the recent "terrorist liquid bomb" conspiracy that filled the airwaves and frightened airline travellers was an unlikely scheme and basically a steaming pile of bovine dung .

we at deskRat carried a story from the british media that examined the "official" version of the event and concluded that the probability of "terrorists" actually mixing up an explosive TATP cocktail during an airline flight the way the british and american authorities claim was being plotted by the people arrested for the crime , was highly unlikely...

from our readings and observations , we at deskRat are convinced that the 9-11 world trade center attacks , richard reid--the ridiculous airline "shoe bomber" , the madrid train bombings , last summer's london subway attacks and now this airline liquid bomb attempt were all sponsored , and allowed to take place --allowed to happen , by the network who are the biggest and most dangerous terrorist organization on the globe--the Us and british governments --an international terrorist crime mob fronted by george "dumbya" bush and his boyfriend tony "phoney" blair--both of whom seriously belong behind prison bars for their murderous deeds .

British Ministry Of Truth Wants To Prosecute American Bloggers
If our Government doesn't like your news you may be a criminal, Next things to be banned on planes may be newspapers

Steve Watson / Infowars | August 31 2006

The decision made by the New York Times to block British readers from seeing an article detailing the liquid terror plot suspects has raised vital questions regarding freedom of information in this country and within cyberspace.

The New York Times said on Tuesday it had blocked British Internet readers from seeing a story detailing elements of the investigation into a suspected plot to blow up airliners between Britain and the United States.

However, this raises the question, what action could be taken against anyone else in America who posts details of the information on their own blog or website?

Well it turns out that you could be prosecuted by the redcoat government.

"There has not been a prosecution for contempt over anybody publishing outside this jurisdiction (Britain), but logically there is no reason why there should not be," said Caroline Kean, partner at UK media law firm Wiggin.

This means that should Alex Jones or Jeff Rense, or anyone in the alternative media in America, post the New York Times story online for all to see then they could face criminal proceedings.

The official reason the story was banned is because it may influence jurors and prevent suspects receiving a "fair trial."

The story reportedly raised questions over the authenticity of the entire plot and suggested that an attempt to blow up the airliners was not as imminent as authorities had suggested.

Any juror in this case that would be influenced by such information would no doubt also be influenced by the furor that the government has made out the alleged plot and its own milking to death of it in an attempt to fear-monger the British public into total subservience and acquiescence.

Whilst many people in this country seem to be scared to death and accepting of whatever the authorities tell them is going to happen, many more seem to have finally woken up and are able to see straight through the mist of lies and spin, doubting that any plot ever existed in the first place.