apology not accepted---too little too late.
Senate approves lynching resolution
By Ana Radelat
Clarion-Ledger Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers demonstrated overwhelming support Monday for a resolution that apologizes for the Senate's failure to do anything to stop lynchings that killed thousands of people over more than eight decades.
About 80 of the 100 members of the Senate co-sponsored the resolution. But Republican Sens. Thad Cochran and Trent Lott were not among them, even though Mississippi led the nation in the numbers of lynchings.
The resolution passed on the same day juror selection began in the trial of Edgar Ray Killen, charged with murder in the 1964 slayings of civil rights workers James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman in Neshoba County.
Sponsored by Sens. George Allen, R-Va., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., the resolution pointed out that 200 anti-lynching bills were introduced in Congress during the first half of the 20th century, and three were approved by the House. But the Senate failed to pass any of them.
Jenny Manley, Cochran's press secretary, said the senator is on a congressional trip to the Paris Air Show and could not be reached for comment.
Lott also could not be reached for comment.
Landrieu said she was moved to sponsor the resolution by a book of photographs of lynchings called "Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America."
The resolution, approved by voice vote, "expresses the deepest sympathies and most solemn regret of the Senate to the descendants of the victims of lynchings, the ancestors of whom were deprived of life, human dignity and the constitutional protections accorded to all citizens of the United States."
One co-sponsor, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chided colleagues who did not sign on to the resolution.
Lynchings took hold during Reconstruction after the Civil War. From 1882 to 1968, there were 4,743. They occurred in nearly every state. Four out of five victims were black. According to the Tuskegee Institute archives, there were 581 lynchings in Mississippi, followed by 531 in Georgia, 391 in Texas, 391 in Louisiana and 347 in Alabama.
Simon Wright, the cousin of Mississippi lynching victim Emmett Till, also came to Washington to witness the event. Till was killed for allegedly whistling at the wife of a white man, Roy Bryant.
Wright, now 62, was sleeping next to the 14-year-old Till on the night of Aug. 28, 1955, when he was awakened by two men he identified as Bryant and J.W. Milam. The men took Till away. Till's mutilated body was later found in a river.
Wright said he felt terror that night, then sadness, outrage and hopelessness. He said the Senate apology was "not enough, but it's a step in the right direction."
"Some people say, 'Don't open old wounds,' " Wright said. "But they weren't wounded. I was."
*what cowardly little punks they are! --too scared to go on record as voting for or against issuing an apology for the senate never having stood up against lynching . america's leadership vacillates between acting like either a bunch of spineless milquetoasts , or a gang of blatant , dimwitted thugs , thieves and murderers...
Anti-lynching vote
Critics: Frist vetoed roll call
> Senators were not required to go on record on issue
> By SCOTT SHEPARD
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
> Published on: 06/15/05
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) refused repeated requests for a roll call vote that would have put senators on the record on a resolution apologizing for past failures to pass anti-lynching laws, officials involved in the negotiations said Tuesday.
And there was disagreement Tuesday over whether Saxby Chambliss, one of Georgia's two Republican senators, had supported the measure when it was approved Monday night.
As dozens of descendants of lynching victims watched from the Senate gallery, the resolution was adopted Monday evening under a voice vote procedure that did not require any senator's presence.
Eighty senators, however, had signed as co-sponsors, putting themselves on record as supporting the resolution. By the time the Senate recessed Tuesday evening, five other senators had added their names as co-sponsors, leaving 15 Republicans who had not.
Georgia Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson was among the 80 sponsors listed Monday night. Chambliss' name was added to the list of co-sponsors after the resolution was adopted, according to the Congressional Record. But his office said he had signed onto the bill as a co-sponsor before Monday's vote.
The resolution was adopted under what is called "unanimous consent," whereby it is adopted as long as no senator expresses opposition.
But the group that was the driving force behind the resolution had asked Frist for a formal procedure that would have required all 100 senators to vote. And the group had asked that the debate take place during "business hours" during the week, instead of Monday evening, when most senators were traveling back to the capital.
Frist declined both requests, the group's chief counsel, Mark Planning, said Tuesday evening.
"It was very disappointing" that Frist handled the matter the way he did, Planning said. "Other groups have gotten roll call votes, so there was nothing new to this, nothing different that we were asking for."
Bob Stevenson, Frist's chief spokesman, said Tuesday evening the procedure the majority leader established was "requested by the sponsors."
The chief sponsors of the resolution, Sens. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and George Allen (R-Va.), disputed that assertion.
Landrieu said Monday before the resolution was adopted she would have preferred a roll call vote but had to accept the conditions set by Senate leaders.
When Stevenson was informed of Landrieu's statement, he amended his comments to say "at least one of the sponsors" had requested adoption on a voice vote and in combination with a resolution related to Black History Month.
Allen press secretary David Snepp took issue with Stevenson. "I don't know why Bob Stevenson would characterize it that way," he said.
Snepp said Allen, since agreeing to sponsor the resolution, had insisted that he preferred a roll call vote.
Planning agreed that Landrieu and Allen "made every effort" to have the resolution debated during the day, when it would attract the most attention from the public, and with a formal roll call of the senators.
"We were very perplexed" that Frist would not agree to that, Planning said.
Jan Cohen, the wife of former Defense Secretary William Cohen and one of the key figures in the Committee for a Formal Apology, expressed outrage over the lack of a roll call vote.
"America is home of the brave, but I'm afraid there may be a few cowards who have to cower to their very narrow-minded and backward, hateful constituency," Cohen told ABC News. "They're hiding out, and it's reminiscent of a pattern of hiding out under a hood, in the night, riding past, scaring people."
Find this article at:
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/0605/15natlynch.html
By Ana Radelat
Clarion-Ledger Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers demonstrated overwhelming support Monday for a resolution that apologizes for the Senate's failure to do anything to stop lynchings that killed thousands of people over more than eight decades.
About 80 of the 100 members of the Senate co-sponsored the resolution. But Republican Sens. Thad Cochran and Trent Lott were not among them, even though Mississippi led the nation in the numbers of lynchings.
The resolution passed on the same day juror selection began in the trial of Edgar Ray Killen, charged with murder in the 1964 slayings of civil rights workers James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman in Neshoba County.
Sponsored by Sens. George Allen, R-Va., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., the resolution pointed out that 200 anti-lynching bills were introduced in Congress during the first half of the 20th century, and three were approved by the House. But the Senate failed to pass any of them.
Jenny Manley, Cochran's press secretary, said the senator is on a congressional trip to the Paris Air Show and could not be reached for comment.
Lott also could not be reached for comment.
Landrieu said she was moved to sponsor the resolution by a book of photographs of lynchings called "Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America."
The resolution, approved by voice vote, "expresses the deepest sympathies and most solemn regret of the Senate to the descendants of the victims of lynchings, the ancestors of whom were deprived of life, human dignity and the constitutional protections accorded to all citizens of the United States."
One co-sponsor, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chided colleagues who did not sign on to the resolution.
Lynchings took hold during Reconstruction after the Civil War. From 1882 to 1968, there were 4,743. They occurred in nearly every state. Four out of five victims were black. According to the Tuskegee Institute archives, there were 581 lynchings in Mississippi, followed by 531 in Georgia, 391 in Texas, 391 in Louisiana and 347 in Alabama.
Simon Wright, the cousin of Mississippi lynching victim Emmett Till, also came to Washington to witness the event. Till was killed for allegedly whistling at the wife of a white man, Roy Bryant.
Wright, now 62, was sleeping next to the 14-year-old Till on the night of Aug. 28, 1955, when he was awakened by two men he identified as Bryant and J.W. Milam. The men took Till away. Till's mutilated body was later found in a river.
Wright said he felt terror that night, then sadness, outrage and hopelessness. He said the Senate apology was "not enough, but it's a step in the right direction."
"Some people say, 'Don't open old wounds,' " Wright said. "But they weren't wounded. I was."
*what cowardly little punks they are! --too scared to go on record as voting for or against issuing an apology for the senate never having stood up against lynching . america's leadership vacillates between acting like either a bunch of spineless milquetoasts , or a gang of blatant , dimwitted thugs , thieves and murderers...
Anti-lynching vote
Critics: Frist vetoed roll call
> Senators were not required to go on record on issue
> By SCOTT SHEPARD
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
> Published on: 06/15/05
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) refused repeated requests for a roll call vote that would have put senators on the record on a resolution apologizing for past failures to pass anti-lynching laws, officials involved in the negotiations said Tuesday.
And there was disagreement Tuesday over whether Saxby Chambliss, one of Georgia's two Republican senators, had supported the measure when it was approved Monday night.
As dozens of descendants of lynching victims watched from the Senate gallery, the resolution was adopted Monday evening under a voice vote procedure that did not require any senator's presence.
Eighty senators, however, had signed as co-sponsors, putting themselves on record as supporting the resolution. By the time the Senate recessed Tuesday evening, five other senators had added their names as co-sponsors, leaving 15 Republicans who had not.
Georgia Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson was among the 80 sponsors listed Monday night. Chambliss' name was added to the list of co-sponsors after the resolution was adopted, according to the Congressional Record. But his office said he had signed onto the bill as a co-sponsor before Monday's vote.
The resolution was adopted under what is called "unanimous consent," whereby it is adopted as long as no senator expresses opposition.
But the group that was the driving force behind the resolution had asked Frist for a formal procedure that would have required all 100 senators to vote. And the group had asked that the debate take place during "business hours" during the week, instead of Monday evening, when most senators were traveling back to the capital.
Frist declined both requests, the group's chief counsel, Mark Planning, said Tuesday evening.
"It was very disappointing" that Frist handled the matter the way he did, Planning said. "Other groups have gotten roll call votes, so there was nothing new to this, nothing different that we were asking for."
Bob Stevenson, Frist's chief spokesman, said Tuesday evening the procedure the majority leader established was "requested by the sponsors."
The chief sponsors of the resolution, Sens. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and George Allen (R-Va.), disputed that assertion.
Landrieu said Monday before the resolution was adopted she would have preferred a roll call vote but had to accept the conditions set by Senate leaders.
When Stevenson was informed of Landrieu's statement, he amended his comments to say "at least one of the sponsors" had requested adoption on a voice vote and in combination with a resolution related to Black History Month.
Allen press secretary David Snepp took issue with Stevenson. "I don't know why Bob Stevenson would characterize it that way," he said.
Snepp said Allen, since agreeing to sponsor the resolution, had insisted that he preferred a roll call vote.
Planning agreed that Landrieu and Allen "made every effort" to have the resolution debated during the day, when it would attract the most attention from the public, and with a formal roll call of the senators.
"We were very perplexed" that Frist would not agree to that, Planning said.
Jan Cohen, the wife of former Defense Secretary William Cohen and one of the key figures in the Committee for a Formal Apology, expressed outrage over the lack of a roll call vote.
"America is home of the brave, but I'm afraid there may be a few cowards who have to cower to their very narrow-minded and backward, hateful constituency," Cohen told ABC News. "They're hiding out, and it's reminiscent of a pattern of hiding out under a hood, in the night, riding past, scaring people."
Find this article at:
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/0605/15natlynch.html
posted by dsekou at 5:03 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home