free speech ? ...yeah right...whatever...
Author: d sekou
Monday, March 14, 2005 - 11:56 am
[No profile available]
wow ! i called in JUST NOW to the "radio times" show carried in syndication out here by npr .
the topic was freedom of the press --in particular they concentrated on the valerie plame case and a reporter's right to not have to reveal their sources . apparently the judith miller /matt cooper thing is an appendage to the valerie plame case --which was the core of the discussion...the guest's article in columbia journalism review was titled something like "the dangers in the valerie plame case"
"Radio Times for Monday, March 14th
Hour 1
Should reporters be required to reveal their sources when the information is useful in prosecuting a crime? That's the question at the core of the case against New York Times reporter Judith Miller and Matt Cooper of Time magazine. We'll explore the dilemma with DOUGLAS McCOLLAM, a lawyer/journalist whose article on the topic was published in the current issue of the Columbia Journalism Review."
they picked up on the second ring --indicating not an overflow of callers this morning
i gave my info-- name and where i was calling from ,explained what my question was and waited patiently on the phone for my turn . then i finally got on .
i brought up the jeff gannon /johnny gosch thing .{http://www.rense.com/general63/hey.htm} told them on -air that it's all over the internet ...the real issue is not "protect your sources/freedom of the press"-- the real issue was whether the bush administration used "freedom of the press/protect your sources" to hide the fact that they committed treason by DELIBERATELY releasing the CLASSIFIED "valerie plame is CIA" info to whitehouse phony 'reporter' jeff gannon as retaliation for plame's husband puncturing bush and blair's "saddam wanted yellow-cake uranium from niger to build a nuke" hoax .
the host-- marty moss-cowain-- asked me on-air where on the internet had i read this --i mentioned sherman skolnick's name --offered to give the web site address ---she IMMEDIATELY said "I'm NOT INTERESTED IN THE WEBSITE ADDRESS" --the guest immediately "pooh poohed" my statement by basically saying it a was a big exaggeration to call outting plame "treason" and went on to continue to his speil about "freedom of the press -quoting thomas jefferson-'i'd rather have A free press and no government than no free press and A government' blah blah blah...spin spin spin bulshit bullshit bullshit" ...
during this LONG speil, i politely kept trying to interject and clarify WHY it was treason, but i don't know if they had me on block and the listening audience could not hear me --i had my radio turned down very low and couldn't hear myself when i tried to speak the second time---BUT i believe they could hear me in the studio because the guy seemed to grow more and more irritated as i tried to respond AS he TALKED OVER ME AND NEVER LET ME GET ANOTHER WORD IN EDGEWISE.
when he finished his spin the host quickly said "we have another caller" and "free speech" was through with me...
interesting that the caller before me asked a question --remained on-air for the guest's reply and then was able to make another comment on the guest's reply...which happens often on these shows--i've heard the host at times ASK for a caller to respond to the guest's response to the caller's question --and appear SURPRISED that the caller did not hold on , and was not there anymore---so it's not unusual to be able to respond to the guest's response to your question --especially since time was not short -- BUT apparently NOT THIS TIME---or as the football player in that VISA commercial on tv says, "Not in OUR house buddy. Not today ! ...Not today... not tomorrow..."
so much for free speech...
*johnny gosch/jeff gannon
sherman skolnick Sherman H. Skolnick
www.cloakanddagger.ca
www.skolnicksreport.com
www.rense.com/Datapages/skolnickdatapage.html
and ted gunderson
sherman skolnick and ted gunderson have been all over this case-- like spandex on a "big" girl... while johnny gosch / jeff gannon has been reported by overseas papers as having negotiated a deal with russian publishers to write a tell-all book to sink the bush administration and others involved... WHERE'S CNN? ..."FAUX" News ?
Monday, March 14, 2005 - 11:56 am
[No profile available]
wow ! i called in JUST NOW to the "radio times" show carried in syndication out here by npr .
the topic was freedom of the press --in particular they concentrated on the valerie plame case and a reporter's right to not have to reveal their sources . apparently the judith miller /matt cooper thing is an appendage to the valerie plame case --which was the core of the discussion...the guest's article in columbia journalism review was titled something like "the dangers in the valerie plame case"
"Radio Times for Monday, March 14th
Hour 1
Should reporters be required to reveal their sources when the information is useful in prosecuting a crime? That's the question at the core of the case against New York Times reporter Judith Miller and Matt Cooper of Time magazine. We'll explore the dilemma with DOUGLAS McCOLLAM, a lawyer/journalist whose article on the topic was published in the current issue of the Columbia Journalism Review."
they picked up on the second ring --indicating not an overflow of callers this morning
i gave my info-- name and where i was calling from ,explained what my question was and waited patiently on the phone for my turn . then i finally got on .
i brought up the jeff gannon /johnny gosch thing .{http://www.rense.com/general63/hey.htm} told them on -air that it's all over the internet ...the real issue is not "protect your sources/freedom of the press"-- the real issue was whether the bush administration used "freedom of the press/protect your sources" to hide the fact that they committed treason by DELIBERATELY releasing the CLASSIFIED "valerie plame is CIA" info to whitehouse phony 'reporter' jeff gannon as retaliation for plame's husband puncturing bush and blair's "saddam wanted yellow-cake uranium from niger to build a nuke" hoax .
the host-- marty moss-cowain-- asked me on-air where on the internet had i read this --i mentioned sherman skolnick's name --offered to give the web site address ---she IMMEDIATELY said "I'm NOT INTERESTED IN THE WEBSITE ADDRESS" --the guest immediately "pooh poohed" my statement by basically saying it a was a big exaggeration to call outting plame "treason" and went on to continue to his speil about "freedom of the press -quoting thomas jefferson-'i'd rather have A free press and no government than no free press and A government' blah blah blah...spin spin spin bulshit bullshit bullshit" ...
during this LONG speil, i politely kept trying to interject and clarify WHY it was treason, but i don't know if they had me on block and the listening audience could not hear me --i had my radio turned down very low and couldn't hear myself when i tried to speak the second time---BUT i believe they could hear me in the studio because the guy seemed to grow more and more irritated as i tried to respond AS he TALKED OVER ME AND NEVER LET ME GET ANOTHER WORD IN EDGEWISE.
when he finished his spin the host quickly said "we have another caller" and "free speech" was through with me...
interesting that the caller before me asked a question --remained on-air for the guest's reply and then was able to make another comment on the guest's reply...which happens often on these shows--i've heard the host at times ASK for a caller to respond to the guest's response to the caller's question --and appear SURPRISED that the caller did not hold on , and was not there anymore---so it's not unusual to be able to respond to the guest's response to your question --especially since time was not short -- BUT apparently NOT THIS TIME---or as the football player in that VISA commercial on tv says, "Not in OUR house buddy. Not today ! ...Not today... not tomorrow..."
so much for free speech...
*johnny gosch/jeff gannon
"Here are a few of the key points from Skolnick's must read, "The Gannon Cannon" series:
"Elite investigators" first revealed that Gannon is in all probability Johnny Gosch.
Gannon, a.k.a. Gosch, is involved in high-level espionage and he's also an expert on torture.
". an expert penetration agent, through sex, compiling negative data on U.S. and foreign governmental officials."
From allegedly eyewitness reports: ". Gannon, alias Gosch, ostensibly is an expert on porno snuff, a murderous form of sexuality"
Gannon, a.k.a. Gosch, was responsible for the Valerie Plame White House leak that allegedly caused 70 CIA undercover agents to be murdered."
"...Does the name, Lawrence E. King and the infamous Franklin Cover-Up scandal ring any bells? And let's not forget Craig Spence's late night tours of the White House with his stable of callboy escorts. The June 29, 1989 edition of the Washington Times salacious headline read, "Homosexual Prostitution Probe Ensnares Official of Bush, Reagan; Call Boys Took Midnight Tour of White House.'' Do you really think any of this high-level organized deviant, criminal behavior has ever really stopped?"
sherman skolnick Sherman H. Skolnick
www.cloakanddagger.ca
www.skolnicksreport.com
www.rense.com/Datapages/skolnickdatapage.html
and ted gunderson
sherman skolnick and ted gunderson have been all over this case-- like spandex on a "big" girl... while johnny gosch / jeff gannon has been reported by overseas papers as having negotiated a deal with russian publishers to write a tell-all book to sink the bush administration and others involved... WHERE'S CNN? ..."FAUX" News ?
posted by dsekou at 11:09 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home