"if you want to understand the world you live in" ...a must see video...a paradigm altering experience !!!

*(click photo for larger image) is this man with the unusual hairline , standing at the texas school book depository moments after JFK was fatally shot , none other than george herbert walker bush --the president's daddy ?

is it the same george herbert walker bush who still says he can't remember where he was that fateful day ?

the same ghw bush who says that even though his "zapata oil" company was working about 30 miles north of cuba around the same time as the bay of pigs invasion--cia's bay of pigs invasion was codenamed zapata btw-- and even though ghw bush's father prescott bush, was a close personal associate of not only the man called "the archetict of the cia", but also close personal associates with the cia's director alan dulles , and the cia's head of recruitment-- ghw bush still insists on his cover story that he was never in the cia until he suddenly became director of the agency in the mid 1970s ?

isn't that's sort of like never having been in the army until one day , just out of the blue , despite the fact you have no experience , they decide to make you 4 star general?

found at google video

Bush Link to Kennedy Assassination JFK II -- Alex Jones 911 Conspiracy
447 ratings ; Avg rating: 4 and one half stars

182,011 views »
578 yesterday «
Alex Jones Productions
1 hr 30 min 27 sec - Sep 1, 2004
www.infowars.com

"A thorough, documented, criminal indictment of George Herbert Walker Bush, establishing beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt as a supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy."


*the first 40 minutes raise important questions --from there on in they take up the question of who did the crime of the 20th century , how they got away with it , why they did it , what nefarious EVIL they are up to now and how they still keep it all covered up to this day... and what it says about little beelzeDUB george dubya , raises some pretty damming questions too---"some investigatin" needs to be done --really !

THERE ARE SOME EVIL , EVIL PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD IN POSITIONS OF HIGH AUTHORITY !

i have a friend who talks to me about the "illuminati" .i've always been sitting on the fence as far as to the question of "does an illuminati really exist?" but after this video , i'm convinced that if there is an illuminati --it's these guys!

i have read about this case and things of this nature since i was a kid--since i was about 13 years old --including most , if not almost all , of what's in this video --but this video connected the dots . they put it altogether in a way that's very hard to argue with.

to be honest , it stunned the hell out of me!!! almost knocked me out of the chair , especially the last 30 or so minutes . THE GUYS THIS VIDEO IS ABOUT ARE EVIL --plain and simple. PURE EVIL !!!

more from "the evil one" also known as president beelzeDUB....

*"i couldn't imagine someone like osama bin laden understanding the joy of hannukah. " -- george dubya bush --- what the fluck ?

this guy is just an endless wellspring of comedic material--if he weren't such a blatant liar ,traitor , fascist , mass murderer and all around general fluck-up incompetent , he'd be one of the funniest men in showbiz...

charlie rangel "said it all"...Hugo Chavez , "You don't condemn MY president "

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eX1lBOxoJeU



*but what might another harlemite say ?

To understand this, you have to go back to what [the] young brother here referred to as the house Negro and the field Negro -- back during slavery. There was two kinds of slaves. There was the house Negro and the field Negro. The house Negroes - they lived in the house with master, they dressed pretty good, they ate good 'cause they ate his food -- what he left. They lived in the attic or the basement, but still they lived near the master; and they loved their master more than the master loved himself. They would give their life to save the master's house quicker than the master would. The house Negro, if the master said, "We got a good house here," the house Negro would say, "Yeah, we got a good house here." Whenever the master said "we," he said "we." That's how you can tell a house Negro.

If the master's house caught on fire, the house Negro would fight harder to put the blaze out than the master would. If the master got sick, the house Negro would say, "What's the matter, boss, we sick?" We sick! He identified himself with his master more than his master identified with himself. And if you came to the house Negro and said, "Let's run away, let's escape, let's separate," the house Negro would look at you and say, "Man, you crazy. What you mean, separate? Where is there a better house than this? Where can I wear better clothes than this? Where can I eat better food than this?" That was that house Negro. In those days he was called a "house nigger." And that's what we call him today, because we've still got some house niggers running around here.

This modern house Negro loves his master. He wants to live near him. He'll pay three times as much as the house is worth just to live near his master, and then brag about "I'm the only Negro out here." "I'm the only one on my job." "I'm the only one in this school." You're nothing but a house Negro. And if someone comes to you right now and says, "Let's separate," you say the same thing that the house Negro said on the plantation. "What you mean, separate? From America? This good white man? Where you going to get a better job than you get here?" I mean, this is what you say. "I ain't left nothing in Africa," that's what you say. Why, you left your mind in Africa.

On that same plantation, there was the field Negro. The field Negro -- those were the masses. There were always more Negroes in the field than there was Negroes in the house. The Negro in the field caught hell. He ate leftovers. In the house they ate high up on the hog. The Negro in the field didn't get nothing but what was left of the insides of the hog. They call 'em "chitt'lin'" nowadays. In those days they called them what they were: guts. That's what you were -- a gut-eater. And some of you all still gut-eaters.

The field Negro was beaten from morning to night. He lived in a shack, in a hut; He wore old, castoff clothes. He hated his master. I say he hated his master. He was intelligent. That house Negro loved his master. But that field Negro -- remember, they were in the majority, and they hated the master. When the house caught on fire, he didn't try and put it out; that field Negro prayed for a wind, for a breeze. When the master got sick, the field Negro prayed that he'd die. If someone come [sic] to the field Negro and said, "Let's separate, let's run," he didn't say "Where we going?" He'd say, "Any place is better than here." You've got field Negroes in America today. I'm a field Negro. The masses are the field Negroes. When they see this man's house on fire, you don't hear these little Negroes talking about "our government is in trouble." They say, "The government is in trouble." Imagine a Negro: "Our government"! I even heard one say "our astronauts." They won't even let him near the plant -- and "our astronauts"! "Our Navy" -- that's a Negro that's out of his mind. That's a Negro that's out of his mind --malcolm x in his speech "message to the grassroots" http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/malcolmxgrassroots.htm

charles rangel , democratic congressman from harlem , seemed very pissed at hugo chavez for calling bush the devil while recently visiting new york to address the Un.

decades ago in a show of solidarity with the "wretched of the earth" , a young fidel castro , also in new york to address the Un , stunned the media by making a side trip to harlem , staying in harlem's teresa hotel and while there , meeting with harlemites including a young firebrand named malcolm x .

apparently hugo chavez , an admirer of castro , especially after castro admits to having personally initiated the cell phone conversations with chavez and with venezuelan generals that served to rally support to chavez and helped save him in the midst of an american inspired coup--and spared chavez a few bullets in the back of the head from the coup plotters--took a page from castro's old playbook and visited a harlem church to address the crowds and repeated his denunciation of "the evil one" dubbed bush.


*note to charlie--ummm... if deeds count for anything --bush IS the devil , and --plain and simple-- you look and sound like nothing less than ole massa beelzedub's uncle tom minion when you defend this arrogant , fascist little prick .


this video clip says it all...




and if that one doesn't , there's this fookin IDIOT...




and this lying little rat...



and file this one under "truth in jest" ...



the very worst of this planet is george w bush...MR. BUSH , YOU ARE A DONKEY ! YOU ARE AN ALCOHOLIC... A DRUNK ... AN ASSASSIN ...A GENOCIDIST...A SICK MAN...PSYCHOLOGICALLY ILL ...YOU ARE A LIAR GEORGE BUSH , YOU ARE A COWARD --Hugo Chavez

this war is lost...

*we first said this war was lost when the news story broke about the 4 blackwater "contractors" being ambushed in fallujah-- killed , burned and hung from a bridge by the iraqis.

the Us-trained iraqi police , saying that it was none of their business , stood by and did nothing but watch as their brethren slaughtered the americans .

they refused to lift a finger to help the americans as the blackwater mercenaries were being ambushed and killed--not even radio in to the nearby Us military base for help.

when we saw that these blackwater "contractors" --all former elite soldiers --were so easily identified , tracked , ambushed and killed by members of the insurgency , we concluded from the quality of intel needed to pull off this ambush , the steadily increasing level of sophistication of the insurgents , but most importantly , the glee with which the populace mutilated the bodies of the dead americans --along with the blatant complicity in this entire senario by america's so-called allies in iraq--the iraqi police force that the Us taxpayers had paid for , trained and supplied--aptly described as the "south vietnamese army" of the middle east --- we at deskRat had a gut feeling that this war was lost.

now , no longer able to deny the truth , Us military intel analysts are beginning to confirm the reality...

Situation Called Dire in West Iraq
Anbar Is Lost Politically, Marine Analyst Says

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, September 11, 2006; A01

The chief of intelligence for the Marine Corps in Iraq recently filed an unusual secret report concluding that the prospects for securing that country's western Anbar province are dim and that there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there, said several military officers and intelligence officials familiar with its contents.

The officials described Col. Pete Devlin's classified assessment of the dire state of Anbar as the first time that a senior U.S. military officer has filed so negative a report from Iraq.

One Army officer summarized it as arguing that in Anbar province, "We haven't been defeated militarily but we have been defeated politically -- and that's where wars are won and lost."

The "very pessimistic" statement, as one Marine officer called it, was dated Aug. 16 and sent to Washington shortly after that, and has been discussed across the Pentagon and elsewhere in national security circles. "I don't know if it is a shock wave, but it's made people uncomfortable," said a Defense Department official who has read the report. Like others interviewed about the report, he spoke on the condition that he not be identified by name because of the document's sensitivity.

Devlin reports that there are no functioning Iraqi government institutions in Anbar, leaving a vacuum that has been filled by the insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq, which has become the province's most significant political force, said the Army officer, who has read the report. Another person familiar with the report said it describes Anbar as beyond repair; a third said it concludes that the United States has lost in Anbar.

Devlin offers a series of reasons for the situation, including a lack of U.S. and Iraqi troops, a problem that has dogged commanders since the fall of Baghdad more than three years ago, said people who have read it. These people said he reported that not only are military operations facing a stalemate, unable to extend and sustain security beyond the perimeters of their bases, but also local governments in the province have collapsed and the weak central government has almost no presence.

Those conclusions are striking because, even after four years of fighting an unexpectedly difficult war in Iraq, the U.S. military has tended to maintain an optimistic view: that its mission is difficult, but that progress is being made. Although CIA station chiefs in Baghdad have filed negative classified reports over the past several years, military intelligence officials have consistently been more positive, both in public statements and in internal reports.

Devlin, as part of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward) headquarters in Iraq, has been stationed there since February, so his report isn't being dismissed as the stunned assessment of a newly arrived officer. In addition, he has the reputation of being one of the Marine Corps' best intelligence officers, with a tendency to be careful and straightforward, said another Marine intelligence officer. Hence, the report is being taken seriously as it is examined inside the military establishment and also by some CIA officials.

Not everyone interviewed about the report agrees with its glum findings. The Defense Department official, who worked in Iraq earlier this year, said his sense is that Anbar province is going to be troubled as long as U.S. troops are in Iraq. "Lawlessness is a way of life there," he said. As for the report, he said, "It's one conclusion about one area. The conclusion on al Anbar doesn't translate into a perspective on the entire country."

No one interviewed would quote from the report, citing its classification, and The Washington Post was not shown a copy of it. But over the past three weeks, Devlin's paper has been widely disseminated in military and intelligence circles. It is provoking intense debate over the key finding that in Anbar, the U.S. effort to clear and hold major cities and the upper Euphrates valley has failed.

The report comes at an awkward time politically, just as a midterm election campaign gets underway that promises to be in part a referendum on the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq war. It also follows by just a few weeks the testimony of Army Gen. John P. Abizaid, the top U.S. commander for the Middle East, who told the Senate Armed Services Committee early last month that "it is possible that Iraq could move toward civil war."

"It's hard to be optimistic right now," said one Army general who has served in Iraq. "There's a sort of critical mass of tough news," he said, with intensifying violence from the insurgency and between Sunnis and Shiites, a lack of effective Iraqi government and a growing concern that Iraq may be falling apart.

"In the analytical world, there is a real pall of gloom descending," said Jeffrey White, a former analyst of Middle Eastern militaries for the Defense Intelligence Agency, who also had been told about the pessimistic Marine report.

Devlin, who is in Iraq, could not be reached to comment. Col. Jerry Renne, a spokesman for the U.S. Central Command, said Saturday that "as a matter of policy, we don't comment on classified documents."

Anbar is a key province; it encompasses Ramadi and Fallujah, which with Baghdad pose the greatest challenge U.S. forces have faced in Iraq. It accounts for 30 percent of Iraq's land mass, encompassing the vast area from the capital to the borders of Syria and Jordan, including much of the area that has come to be known as the Sunni Triangle.

The insurgency arguably began there with fighting in Fallujah not long after U.S. troops arrived in April 2003, and fighting has since continued. Thirty-three U.S. military personnel died there in August -- 17 from the Marines, 13 from the Army and three from the Navy.

A second general who has read the report warned that he thought it was accurate as far as it went, but agreed with the defense official that Devlin's "dismal" view may not have much applicability elsewhere in Iraq. The problems facing Anbar are peculiar to that region, he and others argued.

But an Army officer in Iraq familiar with the report said he considers it accurate. "It is best characterized as 'realistic,' " he said.

"From what I understand, it is very candid, very unvarnished," said retired Marine Col. G. I. Wilson. "It says the emperor has no clothes."

One view of the report offered by some Marine officers is that it is a cry for help from an area where fighting remains intense, yet which recently has been neglected by top commanders and Bush administration officials as they focus on bringing a sense of security to Baghdad. An Army unit of Stryker light armored vehicles that had been slated to replace another unit in Anbar was sent to reinforce operations in Baghdad, leaving commanders in the west scrambling to move around other troops to fill the gap.

Devlin's report is a work of intelligence analysis, not of policy prescription, so it does not try to suggest what, if anything, can be done to fix the situation. It is not clear what the implications would be for U.S. forces if Devlin's view is embraced by top commanders elsewhere in Iraq. U.S. officials are wary of simply abandoning the Sunni parts of Iraq, for fear that they could become havens for al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups.

One possible solution would be to try to turn over the province to Iraqi forces, but that could increase the risk of a full-blown civil war. Shiite-dominated forces might begin slaughtering Sunnis, while Sunni-dominated units might simply begin acting independently of the central government.
© 2006 The Washington Post Company

big pimping --dubya style

George W. Bush outside Ladder Company 10 firehouse opposite the site of the World Trade Center in New York, September 10, 2006--*once again pimping 9-11 for all its worth...at least the pimps in the video featured in the post below admit to what they are ...

no shortage of fools among us...

prosecute this...you lying british ARSE HOLES !

knucklehead "al qaeda" shoe bomber , richard "ridiculous" reid --apprehended by passengers and stewardesses on an airliner while supposedly trying to light a fuse to detonate plastic explosives hidden in his footwear--

umm if richie bwoy , is as government insists , an "al qaeda" operative , either al qaeda must have scraped well underneath the proverbial bottom of the barrel to find him ...or some government has run a huge hoax on the gullible public concerning this so-called "war on terror" .

"*plastic explosive --A general term for any of a class of high explosives which is malleable (plastic) at room temperature. Popular because of its stability (it will not detonate when burned, dropped, or shot at), yield, and ease of use." --quoted from "everything.com"

* addendum--from further examination of articles written around the time of the shoebomber incident we find that the initial reports of plastic explosives being , pardon the pun , the "sole" ingredient in reid's shoes were revised.

the later reports claim that about 10 ounces of plastic explosives were mixed with TATP--the key ingredient described in deskRat's "did they bull-sh_ _ us again?" posting of 8-24-06 .

according to officials , the TATP was to be the detonator of the plastic explosives in reid's shoes.

a fuse containing black powder was supposed to trigger the TATP detonator , but again the official plot fails to make sense .

first of all , why use a "sore thumb" standout like reid for an operation you wanted to succeed ?

he was described by law enforcement officials as too stupid to tie his own shoelaces . they referred to him as the "kramer of al qaeda" --tall , clumsy , goofy-looking with a wild hairstyle .

one of the stewardess commented that reid repeatedly refused to eat or drink anything -- even water -- during the long 10 hour trans-atlantic flight and drew further suspicions because his physical appearance was weird like a "druggie ."

if al qaeda's plan was to blowup aircraft by smuggling bombs on board undetected in shoes , why tip their hand by sending such a conspicuous-looking imbecile ?

the question too must be raised concerning who passed reid through french , dutch and israeli security when his travel history , behavior profile , use of one way tickets paid for in cash , lack of any check-in luggage for an overseas flight and most importantly , his poorly forged passport --whose picture reid did not even match , should have immediately triggered the warning alarms as signs these nations' highly trained airport security professionals are taught to spot.

it would take a sophisticated chemist and operative to create the TATP , mix the highly unstable crystals in with plastic explosives , place it all in a shoe and NOT prematurely detonate the bomb by walking too heavily , stumbling , tripping etc --in other words , the stuff was so unstable that a simple unexpected impact could set it off .

reid's plot was discovered when passengers complained of smelling something burning as he ignited matches and held them to his sneakers .

the stewardess warned him that NO SMOKING WAS ALLOWED ON THE FLIGHT. WHEN HE CONTINUED LIGHTING MATCHES the stewardess finally saw that he was trying to light the fuse in his sneaker . she began screaming and fighting him which then triggered the confrontation , and passenger intervention that led to reid's apprehension.

but the point is , that drawing even more attention to himself by lighting matches on a plane was not best means of detonation for richard reid's shoe device ..."What Richard Reid didn’t know, as he tried to strike a match to ignite his TATP-lined shoes, was that it’s very shock-sensitive. If he had simply stamped his foot, he and the plane might have been history."




also on related theme , there was a story at alex jones' site infowars.com that said british authorities were threatening to prosecute certain individuals , including bloggers , because the brits were incensed at a report carried by the new york times that the recent "terrorist liquid bomb" conspiracy that filled the airwaves and frightened airline travellers was an unlikely scheme and basically a steaming pile of bovine dung .

we at deskRat carried a story from the british media that examined the "official" version of the event and concluded that the probability of "terrorists" actually mixing up an explosive TATP cocktail during an airline flight the way the british and american authorities claim was being plotted by the people arrested for the crime , was highly unlikely...

from our readings and observations , we at deskRat are convinced that the 9-11 world trade center attacks , richard reid--the ridiculous airline "shoe bomber" , the madrid train bombings , last summer's london subway attacks and now this airline liquid bomb attempt were all sponsored , and allowed to take place --allowed to happen , by the network who are the biggest and most dangerous terrorist organization on the globe--the Us and british governments --an international terrorist crime mob fronted by george "dumbya" bush and his boyfriend tony "phoney" blair--both of whom seriously belong behind prison bars for their murderous deeds .

British Ministry Of Truth Wants To Prosecute American Bloggers
If our Government doesn't like your news you may be a criminal, Next things to be banned on planes may be newspapers

Steve Watson / Infowars | August 31 2006

The decision made by the New York Times to block British readers from seeing an article detailing the liquid terror plot suspects has raised vital questions regarding freedom of information in this country and within cyberspace.

The New York Times said on Tuesday it had blocked British Internet readers from seeing a story detailing elements of the investigation into a suspected plot to blow up airliners between Britain and the United States.

However, this raises the question, what action could be taken against anyone else in America who posts details of the information on their own blog or website?

Well it turns out that you could be prosecuted by the redcoat government.

"There has not been a prosecution for contempt over anybody publishing outside this jurisdiction (Britain), but logically there is no reason why there should not be," said Caroline Kean, partner at UK media law firm Wiggin.

This means that should Alex Jones or Jeff Rense, or anyone in the alternative media in America, post the New York Times story online for all to see then they could face criminal proceedings.

The official reason the story was banned is because it may influence jurors and prevent suspects receiving a "fair trial."

The story reportedly raised questions over the authenticity of the entire plot and suggested that an attempt to blow up the airliners was not as imminent as authorities had suggested.

Any juror in this case that would be influenced by such information would no doubt also be influenced by the furor that the government has made out the alleged plot and its own milking to death of it in an attempt to fear-monger the British public into total subservience and acquiescence.

Whilst many people in this country seem to be scared to death and accepting of whatever the authorities tell them is going to happen, many more seem to have finally woken up and are able to see straight through the mist of lies and spin, doubting that any plot ever existed in the first place.